Volume 5, Issue 5, September 2016, Page: 285-289
Towards Efficiency in the Residual and Parametric Bootstrap Techniques
Acha Chigozie K., Department of Statistics, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike, Umudike, Nigeria
Omekara Chukwuemeka O., Department of Statistics, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike, Umudike, Nigeria
Received: Jul. 20, 2016;       Accepted: Jul. 30, 2016;       Published: Aug. 17, 2016
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160505.16      View  2529      Downloads  76
Abstract
There are many bootstrap methods that can be used for statistical analysis especially in econometrics, biometrics, Statistics, Sampling and so on. The sole aim of this paper is to ascertain the accuracy and efficiency of the estimates from the independent and identically distributed (iid) simple linear regression (SLR) model under a variety of assessment conditions using bootstrap techniques. Analysis was carried out using S-plus statistical package on hypothetical data sets from a normal distribution with different group proficiency levels to buttress the arguments in the paper. In the course of the analysis, 268,800 scenarios were replicated 1000 times. The result shows a significant difference between the performances of the bootstrap methods used, namely; residual and parametric bootstrap techniques. From the analysis, the largest bias and standard error were always associated with model HP311 while the smallest bias and standard error values were associated with models HR311. The exception was found in the group proficiency level 3- N (1, 0.25), when the sample sizes were 200, 1000 and 10000 instead of model HR311 producing the smallest bias and standard error, model RP311 did. The significantly better performance of the residual bootstrap indicates the possible use of this technique in assessment of comparative performance and the capability of yielding very accurate, consistent, faster and extra-ordinarily reliable statistical inference under several assessment conditions.
Keywords
Residual Bootstrap, Efficiency, Sufficiency, Parametric Bootstrap, Technique
To cite this article
Acha Chigozie K., Omekara Chukwuemeka O., Towards Efficiency in the Residual and Parametric Bootstrap Techniques, American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. Vol. 5, No. 5, 2016, pp. 285-289. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160505.16
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Efron, B. (1983). Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: improvements on cross-validation. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 78, 316-331.
[2]
Politis, D. N. and Romano J. P. (1994a). The stationary bootstrap. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 89, 1303-1313.
[3]
Paparoditis, E., and Politis, D. N. (2001a). Tapered block bootstrap. Biometrika 88, 1105-1119.
[4]
Lahiri, S. N. (2006). Bootstrap Methods: A Review. In Frontiers in Statistics (J. Fan and H. L. Koul, editors) 231-265, Imperial College Press, London.
[5]
Paparoditis, E., and Politis, D. N. (2005). Bootstrapping unit root tests for autoregressive time series. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 100, 545-553.
[6]
Schimek, M. G. (2000) Smoothing and Regression. Wiley, Hoboken.
[7]
Chernick, M. R. (1999). Bootstrap Methods: A Practitioners Guide. Wiley, New York.
[8]
Chernick, M. R. and LaBudde, R. (2011). An Introduction to the Bootstrap with Applications in R Wiley, Hoboken.
[9]
Paparoditis, E., and Politis, D. N. (2001b). A Markovian local resampling scheme for nonparametric estimators in time series analysis. Econ. Theory 1, 540-566.
[10]
Paparoditis, E. (2005). Testing the fit of a vector autoregressive moving average model. J. Time Series Anal. 26, 543-568.
[11]
Politis, D. N., and White, H. (2004). Automatic block-length selection for the dependent bootstrap. Econ. Rev. 23, 53-70.
[12]
Politis, K. (2003). Semiparametric estimation for non-ruin probabilities. Scand. Act. J., 75-96.
[13]
Wilcox, R., and Keselman, H. (2006). Detecting heteroscedasticity in a simple regression model via quantile regression slopes. J. Statist. Comput. Simul. 76, 705-712.
[14]
William G. J. and David A. A. (2014), Bootstrap Confidence Regions for Multidimensional Scaling Solutions. American Journal of Political Science, 58 (1); 264-278.
[15]
Acha, C. K. (2014a) Parametric Bootstrap Methods for Parameter Estimation in SLR Models. International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management, 2 (5), 175-179. Doi: 10.12691/ijefm-2-5-2.
[16]
Acha, C. K. (2014b) Bootstrapping Normal and Binomial Distributions. International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management, 2 (6), 253– 256. Doi: 10.12691/ijefm-2-6-2.
[17]
Acha, C. K. and Acha I. A. (2015) Smooth Bootstrap Methods on External Sector Statistics. International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management, 3 (3), 115–120. Doi: 10.12691/ijefm-3-3-2.
[18]
Wang, T., Lee, W., Brennan, R. L. & Kolen, M. J. (2008). A comparison of frequency estimation and chained equipercentile methods under the common-item nonequivalent groups design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 632-651.
[19]
Wang, T. & Brennan, R. L. (2009). A modified frequency estimation equating method for the common-item nonequivalent groups design estimating random error in equipercentile equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 118-132.
[20]
Hanson, B. A., & B´eguin, A. A. (2002). Obtaining a common scale for item response theory item parameters using separate versus concurrent estimation in the common-item equating design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 3-24.
[21]
Lee, W. C., & Ban, J. C. (2007). Comparison of Three IRT Linking Procedures in the Random Groups Equating Design. Center for Advanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment CASMA Research Report (23) 1-27.
Browse journals by subject